How to add an alter ego as a judgment debtor to a judgment
in California is the topic of this blog post. This procedure is authorized in
California under Code of Civil Procedure section 187. The alter ego liability theory is the most
common reason request amendment of a judgment although successor corporation
liability can also be used in appropriate situations.
The alter ego theory essentially argues that an identity exists between the new party and
the original party, whose participation in the trial leading to the judgment
represented the newly added party.
Amending a judgment
to add a judgment debtor is a powerful tool if used in the appropriate types of
situations.
An excellent example
of such a situation would be a case where a professional corporation is owned
by one person who then proceeds to drain the assets of the corporation by
alleging they are “loan repayments” to the individual and sole shareholder
before dissolving the corporation. Then under an almost identical name they
continue to practice their profession at the same location as the
dissolved professional corporation.
When examined under oath at a judgment debtor examination they fail to
produce any corporate minutes or resolutions regarding the alleged loans.
Another example of a
good situation might be that of a successor corporation who continues the same
exact business as the predecessor except for the name.
Code of Civil Procedure section 187 states that, “When jurisdiction
is, by the Constitution or this Code, or by any other statute, conferred on a
Court or judicial officer, all the means necessary to carry it into effect are
also given; and in the exercise of this jurisdiction, if the course of
proceeding be not specifically pointed out by this Code or the statute, any suitable
process or mode of proceeding may be adopted which may appear most conformable
to the spirit of this Code.”
Numerous decisions
of the California Courts of Appeal have stated that Code of Civil Procedure
section 187 allows a trial court to amend a judgment to add judgment debtors. The rationale used is that amending a
judgment to add an alter ego as a judgment debtor does not result in the
addition of a new defendant but merely inserts the correct name of the real
defendant.
And a recent
decision from a California Court of Appeal states that great liberality is
encouraged in the allowance of amendments brought pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure section 187. That
same Court also
stated there is no requirement for any evidentiary hearing, a noticed motion is
all that is required.
Attorneys or parties
in California who would like to view a portion of a sample 12 page motion to
amend a judgment containing a memorandum of points and authorities with
citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of
service sold by the author can use the link shown below.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 245 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit Subscribe to FREE weekly legal newsletter for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment