How to force the disclosure of a confidential informant in
California is the topic of this blog post. A
motion must be filed with the Court to request that the Court order the
identity of a confidential informant be disclosed on the grounds that the confidential
informant is a material witness as they were a participant in the alleged crime
and an eyewitness to it, thus they can testify regarding the defendant’s guilt
or innocence.
This motion is very powerful for the simple reason that if
disclosure is ordered by the Court and the People do not disclose the identity
of the informant the case against the defendant must be dismissed.
The California Supreme Court has stated that a defendant
filing this motion must make a showing of a reasonable possibility that the
informant could give evidence on the issue of guilt that might result in the
exoneration of the defendant. The defendants does not need to prove that the
informant would give that testimony, but only needs to show some evidence of a
possibility that the confidential informant is a material witness.
The California Supreme Court has also stated that once a
defendant meets their burden and made an adequate showing that the informant
may be a material witness on the issue of guilt or innocence, the identity of
the informant must be disclosed or the criminal charges against the defendant
must be dismissed.
The defendant must demonstrate the witness’s—not the
testimony’s—material character. People
v. Mejia (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 574, 580.
Several decisions of the California Courts of Appeal have
held that an informant who is an actual participant in the crime alleged or a
nonparticipating eyewitness to it will be presumed to be a material witness.
Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a
portion of a sample motion to disclose a confidential informant in California sold
by the author and containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and
authorities with citations to case law, sample declaration and proof of service
by mail can use the link shown below.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 245 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit Subscribe to FREE weekly legal newsletter for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment