A reconsideration motion in a California dissolution (divorce) case is the topic of this blog post. Parties
in California who wish to request reconsideration of an order may file a motion
for reconsideration pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a) which is the
statute that authorizes reconsideration of an order in California. A motion for reconsideration can also be filed
in a legal separation or nullity case in California as well as a divorce case.
A motion for reconsideration in California can be useful if a
party is aware of the limitations involved. The first and most important limitation is the
10 day deadline for filing the motion. A statutory motion for reconsideration
must be filed within 10 days after service on the party of written notice of
entry of the order. The second limitation is the requirement that the party
moving for reconsideration of an order must make a showing of new or different
facts, circumstances or law since the date of the original order that the moving
party was not aware of and could not have discovered with reasonable diligence.
Code of Civil Procedure § 1008(a) states that “When an
application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused
in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any
party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of
written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts,
circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made
the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior
order. The party making the application shall state by affidavit what
application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions
were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed
to be shown.”
A motion for reconsideration may made in a California
divorce or other family law case pursuant to Family Code § 210 which states
that, “Except to the extent that any other statute or rules adopted by the Judicial
Council provide applicable rules, the rules of practice and procedure
applicable to civil actions generally, including the provisions of Title 3a
(commencing with Section 391) of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, apply
to, and constitute the rules of practice and procedure in, proceedings under
this code.”
Several decisions of the California Courts of Appeal have
stated that a decision on a motion is not res judicata, and a trial court has
jurisdiction to reconsider a prior ruling.
A motion for reconsideration is only applicable to interim
orders, not final orders. Note that any
party affected by an order may file a motion as reconsideration is not limited
to the party who filed the original application for an order.
Attorneys and parties
in California who would like to view a portion of a sample 11 page motion for
reconsideration containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and
authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample
declaration and proof of service by mail sold by the author can use the link shown
below.
Attorneys or parties who would like to view portions of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation sold by the author of this blog post can use the link shown below.
View over 300 sample legal documents for sale
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment