Assets that were not listed in any divorce decree or judgment in California
Sometime parties in California that have already had a dissolution (divorce) judgment in California discover an omitted asset many weeks or months later and wonder what their options are. This blog post discusses the issue of assets or liabilities that were not listed in any divorce decree or judgment in California. These are what is known as omitted assets.
A party can request that the court adjudicate any assets or liabilities that were not mentioned in the judgment of divorce as those assets were not previously adjudicated in the judgment of dissolution of marriage and in most cases were never mentioned in any documents filed with the court or any court orders. The request is filed under the provisions of Family Code section 2556. by the filing of a notice of motion or request for order.
A request filed under Family Code section 2556 is most often filed in divorce cases but can
also be filed in a legal separation or nullity case in
California.
If you use this request in the right situations it is very powerful as there are no time
limitation specified in the statute although in my personal opinion you should file the
motion as soon as possible after discovering the omitted asset or liability is
a good idea. I also want to point out that the court will most likely deny any request if you have already filed another motion or request with the court under another code section or legal theory that mentions the omitted asset and the court has denied that request
Family Code § 2556 states that,
“In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, for nullity of
marriage, or for legal separation of the parties, the court has continuing
jurisdiction to award community estate assets or community estate liabilities
to the parties that have not been previously adjudicated by a judgment in the
proceeding. A party may file a postjudgment motion or order to show cause in
the proceeding in order to obtain adjudication of any community estate asset or
liability omitted or not adjudicated by the judgment. In these cases, the court
shall equally divide the omitted or unadjudicated community estate asset or
liability, unless the court finds upon good cause shown that the interests of
justice require an unequal division of the asset or liability.”
Before this code section was enacted into California law the
courts allowed a former spouse to file a separate partition action to divide
any assets that were omitted from a divorce judgment.
Any community estate asset or liability that was not
mentioned in the judgment should most likely be considered an omitted asset.
Both the California Supreme Court and the California Courts
of Appeal have stated that the doctrine of res judicata does not prevent the
division of community property assets that were not adjudicated in any prior
judgment.
The California Supreme Court has also stated that the entitlement
of a spouse to a share of any community property arises at the time that the
property is acquired and any property which is not mentioned in the judgment or
any of the pleadings is considered unadjudicated by any judgment and is
therefore subject to further legal proceedings as the former spouses are
considered tenants in common until the asset can be adjudicated.
The moving party should make a sufficient showing that the
omitted asset or liability is in fact a community estate asset or liability as
the asset was acquired or the liability was incurred during the marriage. The California Supreme Court has stated that
any property acquired by purchase during the marriage is presumed to be
community property.
Attorneys or parties in California that would like to view a
portion of a sample 11 page motion to adjudicate an omitted asset under Family
Code section 2556 containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and
authorities and sample declaration sold by the author can use the link below.
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.
If you are in need of assistance with any California or
Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr.
Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information.
He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most
credit or debit cards.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit Subscribe to FREE weekly legal newsletter for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by visiting http://www.legaldocspro.net
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
