A Code of Civil Procedure section 632 statement of decision
in a California divorce case is the topic of this blog post. Code
of Civil Procedure section 632 and Family Code section 210 authorize a request
for a statement of decision in California divorce or other family law cases
such as legal separation or nullity cases.
Requesting a statement of decision is an excellent idea in
any contested divorce or other family law case in California but is
particularly useful in situations when there are numerous issues such as child
custody and visitation, child support, spousal support etc., that were decided
at the trial.
Requesting a statement of decision allows the party to
require the Court to state the legal reasoning for its decision on certain contested
issues which in legal terminology are known as controverted issues. A statement of decision is extremely important
in most if not all cases as failing to make a timely request for a statement of
decision on all of the controverted issues in a case is almost always fatal to
any possible appeal of the case as the reviewing court is required to presume
that every fact essential to the judgment was proved and found by the trial
court if no statement of decision has been requested.
Any party appearing at the trial may request a statement of
decision. Code of Civil Procedure § 632
states in pertinent part that if the trial is concluded within one calendar
day, or in less than eight hours spread out over more than one day, the request
must be made before the matter is submitted for decision. If the trial is longer than that, the request
must be made within 10 days after the court announces a tentative decision.
A trial shall be deemed to actually commence at the
beginning of the opening statement or argument of any party or his or her
counsel, or if there is no opening statement, then at the time of the
administering of the oath or affirmation to the first witness, or the
introduction of any evidence. See Code of Civil Procedure § 581(a)(6).
The 10-day period for making the request commences at the
time the clerk mails the copy of the minute order or decision. See Hutchins v.
Glanda (1990) 216 Cal. App. 3d 1529, 1531.
If counsel makes a timely request for the statement, the
court's failure to prepare the statement is reversible error. See Social
Service Union, Local 535 v. County of Monterey (1989) 208 Cal. App. 3d 676,
681.
The party requesting a statement of decision should be sure
to include all important controverted issues in their request as a California
Court of Appeal has stated that the request for a statement of decision must
specify the controverted issues for which a statement of decision is
requested. The trial judge is not
required to sift through a host of improper specifications in search of a few
arguably proper ones. Although a party cannot be prevented from using the
request as a way of arguing with the court rather than clarifying the grounds
of its decision, a party who makes that choice is not entitled to rely on the
resulting document to insulate the judgment from the presumption of
correctness. See Yield Dynamics, Inc. v.
TEA Systems Corp. (2007) 154 Cal. App. 4th 547, 558-559.
When there has been a request for a statement of decision,
the statement of decision may be limited to only those issues specified in the
request if less than all material issues are specified See Harvard Investment
Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc. (1984) 156 Cal. App. 3d 704, 709 n.3.
If an issue was not brought up at the trial, the reviewing
court is under no obligation to address it. See Colony Ins. Co. v. Crusader
Ins. Co. (2010) 188 Cal. App. 4th 743, 750-751.
A party waives any objection on appeal based on the trial
court's failure to file a written statement of decision when trial lasts less
than one day and that party fails to make an oral request, and when language in
that party's points and authorities that were alleged to be a written request
was not specific, but merely asked court to find in her favor. See Martinez v.
County of Tulare (1987) 190 Cal. App. 3d 1430, 1434-1435.
If no statement of decision has been requested, the
reviewing court is required to presume that every fact essential to the
judgment was proved and found by the trial court. Review in these circumstances
is limited to a determination as to whether there is any evidence, contradicted
or uncontradicted, to support the judgment. See Agri-Systems, Inc. v. Foster
Poultry Farms (2008) 168 Cal. App. 4th 1128, 1134-1135.
Requesting a statement of decision is an excellent way for any
party involved in contested divorce proceedings in California to require that
the Court give a detailed explanation of the basis and reasoning behind its
decision on the controverted issues.
Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a
portion of a sample 7 page request for statement of decision in a California divorce
case that includes brief instructions as well as a sample proposal for content
of statement decision and proof of service by mail sold by the author can use
the link shown below.
Sample request for statement of decision in California divorce
Attorneys or parties who would like to view portions of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation sold by the author of this blog post can use the link shown below.
View over 300 sample legal documents for sale
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment