An opposition to a Code of Civil Procedure section 663
motion to set aside and vacate a judgment and enter another and different
judgment in California is the topic of this blog post.
Any party wishing to oppose a motion under Code of Civil
Procedure section should serve and file their opposition at least nine (9)
court days before the hearing and should be served by personal delivery or
overnight mail pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 unless the
court has ordered otherwise.
Any party served with a motion to vacate and enter a
different judgment should review closely the motion and all supporting
declaration to determine what grounds exist for an opposition. The first possible ground for opposition is
that the motion is not timely filed as in most cases the motion must be filed
within 15 days after the party is served with a notice of entry of judgment,
either by the clerk of the court, or any other party. For more information parties should review
Code of Civil Procedure section 663a.
Other possible grounds for opposition would be that the
moving party has not met their burden of showing sufficient facts or evidence
to support either of the two grounds listed in Code of Civil Procedure section
663 which states that,
“A judgment or decree, when based upon a decision by the
court, or the special verdict of a jury, may, upon motion of the party
aggrieved, be set aside and vacated by the same court, and another and
different judgment entered, for either of the following causes, materially
affecting the substantial rights of the party and entitling the party to a
different judgment:
1. Incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision, not
consistent with or not supported by the facts; and in such case when the
judgment is set aside, the statement of decision shall be amended and
corrected.
2. A judgment or decree not consistent with or not supported
by the special verdict.”
The opposition should include enough supporting facts and
evidence to support the opposition such as the fact that a judgment entered
after a court trial is consistent with the legal conclusion to be drawn from
the facts as found by the court and that the motion may not challenge the
factual bases for the decision of the court, and for a judgment entered after a
jury trial that the judgment is consistent with the special verdict of the
jury.
A California Court of Appeal ruled in a case from over 75
years ago that so long as the judgment
rendered is the correct legal conclusion to be drawn from the facts found by the
court, any motion to set aside and vacate a judgment and enter another and
different judgment should be denied.
Another
California Court of Appeal in a recent case ruled that a motion to set aside
and vacate a judgment and enter another and different judgment cannot be used
to challenge the factual bases for the decision of the court.
Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a
portion of a 10 page sample opposition to a motion to set aside and vacate a judgment and enter
another and different judgment containing brief instructions, a memorandum of
points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority,
sample declaration and proof of service sold by the author can use the link
shown below.
Sample opposition to motion to vacate judgment in California
Sample opposition to motion to vacate judgment in California
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit Subscribe to FREE weekly newsletter for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: Twitter page for LegalDocsPro
You can view sample legal document packages for sale by visiting: Sample legal document packages for sale
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post
have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not
legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is
not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business
relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon
this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment