The
California Supreme Court has held that if a tenant proves retaliation by a
preponderance of the evidence, he or she is entitled to a judgment of
possession. And a California residential tenant who successfully defends an
eviction complaint on the ground of retaliatory eviction is entitled to recover
both actual and punitive damages as well as retaining possession of the
property pursuant to Civil Code § 1942.5.
The
law in California provides that residential landlords cannot take certain
actions in retaliation for the tenant’s exercising his or her legal rights.
Actions that can be considered retaliatory include increasing rent,
decreasing services or causing a tenant to quit the rental property
involuntarily.
The
statutory provisions regarding retaliatory eviction in California are found in
Civil Code §1942.5. A California tenant cannot waive his or her rights under
Civil Code §1942.5.
A
California tenant has a valid affirmative defense if he or she can show that
the landlord retaliated against him or her in violation of Civil Code § 1942.5.
The
claimed retaliatory action must have occurred within 180 days of the tenant’s
lawful exercise of rights and the statutory defense may be used only once in a
12-month period pursuant to Civil Code § 1942.5.
The
California Supreme Court has held that both residential and commercial
tenants have a common-law affirmative defense for retaliatory actions by the
landlord. See Barela v Superior Court (Valdez) (1981) 30 Cal. 3d 244,
251.
However
it is not retaliatory eviction if a landlord in good faith communicates his or
her belief that the tenant is violating a term of the lease. See Morrison v
Vineyard Creek (2011) 193 Cal.App 4th 1254, 1268–1271, in that case the tenant
had exercised their legal right to conduct a family child-care home on the premises.
Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a sample answer to a California eviction complaint that contains 15 affirmative defenses including retaliatory eviction that is sold by the author can use the link shown below.
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 235 sample legal documents. Visit his website at LegalDocsPro website and his Facebook page at Facebook page
If you enjoy this blog post, tell others about it. They can subscribe to the author’s weekly California legal newsletter by visiting the following link: Subscribe to FREE weekly newsletter
Copyright 2013 Stan Burman. All rights reserved.
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment