Search This Blog

Showing posts with label California real property law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California real property law. Show all posts

Friday, September 19, 2014

Residential security deposit requirements in California under Civil Code section 1950.5

Residential security deposit requirements in California are the topic of this blog post. This post will discuss briefly some of the main provisions of Civil Code section 1950.5 which governs a security deposit for a residential property in California.  California tenants who rent residential property are often unaware of the more important provisions relating to security deposits such as how much security deposit the landlord can require them to pay when they move in and if the landlord can call any portion of their security deposit nonrefundable.  Some landlords in California do attempt to collect a nonrefundable “cleaning deposit” when a tenant signs a lease even though that is prohibited by California law.

One of the most important provisions is found in Civil Code section 1950.5(c) which states in pertinent part that, “A landlord may not demand or receive security, however denominated, in an amount or value in excess of an amount equal to two months’ rent, in the case of unfurnished residential property, and an amount equal to three months’ rent, in the case of furnished residential property, in addition to any rent for the first month paid on or before initial occupancy. Thus a landlord cannot require that a tenant pay more than an amount equal to two months rent for an unfurnished unit and more than an amount equal to three months rent for a furnished rent.

Civil Code section 1940.5(g) provides that if the tenant has a waterbed the landlord is entitled to increase the security deposit in an amount equal to one-half of one month’s rent.

Another very important provision is found in Civil Code section 1950.5(m) which states that, “No lease or rental agreement may contain a provision characterizing any security as “nonrefundable.”

The landlord can only claim from the security deposit those amounts that are reasonably necessary such as:

The repair of damages to the premises, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, caused by the tenant or by a guest or licensee of the tenant.

The cleaning of the premises upon termination of the tenancy necessary to return the unit to the same level of cleanliness it was in at the inception of the tenancy.

To remedy future defaults by the tenant in any obligation under the rental agreement to restore, replace, or return personal property or appurtenances, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, if the security deposit is authorized to be applied thereto by the rental agreement.

The landlord cannot charge the tenant for any damages that occurred before the tenant moved in pursuant to Civil Code section 1950.5(e) which states that, “The landlord may claim of the security only those amounts as are reasonably necessary for the purposes specified in subdivision (b). The landlord may not assert a claim against the tenant or the security for damages to the premises or any defective conditions that preexisted the tenancy, for ordinary wear and tear or the effects thereof, whether the wear and tear preexisted the tenancy or occurred during the tenancy, or for the cumulative effects of ordinary wear and tear occurring during any one or more tenancies.”

Civil Code section 1950.5(g) which governs the disposition and return of the security deposit is quite detailed but briefly stated it requires that within 21 calendar days after the tenant has vacated the premises the landlord must personally deliver or mail to the tenant an itemized statement that details all the charges made against the security deposit as well as returning any remaining portion of the security deposit to the tenant.  The landlord must also includes copies of all relevant documents such as bills, invoices, etc. showing the charges that were incurred if the landlord or landlord’s employee did not do the work. If the landlord or landlord’s employee did do the work the statement must describe the work performed, the time spent and the reasonable hourly rate charged for the work.   The landlord does not have to provide copies or a detailed itemization if the deductions for repairs and cleaning together do not exceed $125.00.

A landlord may not make a bad faith claim or retain a security deposit in bad faith. If they do they may be subject to statutory damages of up to twice the amount of the security, in addition to actual damages and they will have the burden of proof as to the reasonableness of the amounts claimed.  See Civil Code section 1950.5(l).

A tenant can sue their former landlord in small claims court as long as their statutory and actual damages do not exceed the current limit of $10,000.00. See Civil Code section 1950.5(n).

Attorneys or parties in California that would like to view a sample security deposit dispute letter in Microsoft Word format created by the author can use the link shown below.


The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 255 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation. If you are in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 255 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.


Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

You can view sample legal document packages for sale at:  http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.


 


 



Wednesday, April 16, 2014

How to release a mechanics lien in California



How to release a mechanics lien in California is the topic of this blog post.  Any California mechanics lien can be released if the claimant does not attempt to enforce the lien within 90 days after the claim of lien is recorded.  The statutes in California that govern petitioning for release of a mechanics lien are found in Civil Code sections 8110 through 8494.

A petition for an order releasing a mechanics lien can be filed once more than 90 days have passed since the mechanics lien was recorded with the County Recorder.  This is due to the fact that Civil Code section 8460(a) states that, “(a) The claimant shall commence an action to enforce a lien within 90 days after recordation of the claim of lien. If the claimant does not commence an action to enforce the lien within that time, the claim of lien expires and is unenforceable.”

Civil Code section 8480 authorizes the filing of a petition for an order to release a mechanics lien.  That code section states in pertinent part that,

““(a) The owner of property or the owner of any interest in property subject to a claim of lien may petition the court for an order to release the property from the claim of lien if the claimant has not commenced an action to enforce the lien within the time provided in § 8460.”

Civil Code section 8482 requires that the owner of the property must give the lien claimant notice demanding that they execute and record a release of the mechanics lien at least 10 days before any petition is filed.

Civil Code section 8102 specifies what information must be included in the notice demanding the release of the mechanics lien. However it should be noted that section 8102 states that so long as the notice given is sufficient to notice is sufficient to substantially inform the person given notice of the information required by this section and other information required in the notice the notice is not invalid.

Civil Code section 8106 and 8110 specify how notice to the lien claimant must be given.

Civil Code section 8106 states that, “Except as otherwise provided by statute, notice under this part shall be given by any of the following means:

(a) Personal delivery.

(b) Mail in the manner provided in Section 8110.

(c) Leaving the notice and mailing a copy in the manner provided in Section 415.20 of the Code of Civil Procedure for service of summons and complaint in a civil action.

Civil Code section 8110 states that, “Except as otherwise provided by this part, notice by mail under this part shall be given by registered or certified mail, express mail, or overnight delivery by an express service carrier.”

Civil Code section 8484 specifies what must be included in the petition for an order releasing a mechanics lien. It should be noted that in addition to including other required information such as the date that the claim of lien was recorded and the book and page number where the claim was recorded, the petition must be verified. 

Civil Code section 8484 states that,

“A petition for a release order shall be verified and shall allege all of the following:

(a) The date of recordation of the claim of lien. A certified copy of the claim of lien shall be attached to the petition.

(b) The county in which the claim of lien is recorded.

(c) The book and page or series number of the place in the official records where the claim of lien is recorded.

(d) The legal description of the property subject to the claim of lien.

(e) Whether an extension of credit has been granted under Section 8460, if so to what date, and that the time for commencement of an action to enforce the lien has expired.

(f) That the owner has given the claimant notice under Section 8482 demanding that the claimant execute and record a release of the lien and that the claimant is unable or unwilling to do so or cannot with reasonable diligence be found.

(g) Whether an action to enforce the lien is pending.

(h) Whether the owner of the property or interest in the property has filed for relief in bankruptcy or there is another restraint that prevents the claimant from commencing an action to enforce the lien.”

Civil Code section 8486 requires that the hearing date on the petition must be set no more than 30 days from the filing of the petition by the clerk unless the Court orders otherwise and that notice of the hearing must be served on the lien claimant at least 15 days before the hearing.

Civil Code section 8488 states that the petitioner has the burden of showing at the hearing
that they have complied with the notice and service requirements. The lien claimant has the burden of proof as to the validity of the lien. Note that the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. 

The current Civil Code sections were revised in 2010 and became effective in 2011. The prior law only allowed for an award of $1,000.00 in attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.   The new law makes it much more advantageous for a party to petition for an order releasing an expired mechanics lien as if they prevail they may be awarded the attorney’s fees that they incurred in filing the petition. 

Attorneys or parties who would like to view a portion of a sample 9 page petition for release of mechanics lien containing brief instructions with citations to the Civil Code regarding the strict requirements for service of the notice, a verification, notice of hearing, and proposed order sold by the author can use the link shown below.


Attorneys or parties who would like to view or download a sample demand letter for release of mechanics lien in California created by the author can use the link shown below.

 
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. If you are in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.

To view over 255 sample legal documents for sale by the author of this blog post visit the following link: http://www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit: http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/

View sample legal document packages for sale here: http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.