Methods for collecting unpaid judgments in California are is the topic of
this blog post which discusses some of the more common methods for collecting
on an unpaid judgment in the State of California. Unpaid judgments are very common as there are
estimates stating that approximately 80% of judgments are never collected.
I have been collecting unpaid judgments in California since
1992 when I worked in industrial property management and over the years I have
collected on many judgments both large and small both as an employee and as a
judgment recovery professional.
Anyone who has ever obtained a judgment soon discovers that
while the Court may enter the judgment they will not collect it for you. Realistically few if any judgment debtors
ever voluntarily pay a judgment which means that the judgment creditor is
responsible for collecting the judgment although the Court will issue certain
documents that are very useful in collecting on a judgment such as writs of
execution, abstracts of judgment, order to appear for examination for a
judgment debtor, etc.
There are two major collection methods that can be used in
collecting an unpaid judgment which are discussed briefly below. Anyone attempting to collect on an unpaid
judgment should carefully consider which of the two methods they wish to use.
The first method is what I call the active method. The
active method involves actively taking steps to collect the judgment such as
levying on bank accounts, scheduling judgment debtor examinations, serving wage
garnishments, requesting assignment orders, etc. The active method is my personal favorite
method for collecting on judgments as it increases the odds of collection
although it does have one major disadvantage which is that
it takes time and money to pursue the active method of judgment collections.
Another disadvantage is that it may persuade the judgment debtor to take
certain actions to avoid having to pay the judgment such as filing for
bankruptcy, moving out of state, etc.
The second method is what I call the passive method. The
passive method only works in cases where
you know that the judgment debtor owns or has an ownership interest in real
property located in a certain county. In
that case you could record an abstract of judgment in the county where the real
property is located and that will place a recorded lien on any present or
future ownership interest by the judgment debtor in any real property located
in that county that will last in most cases until the judgment expires or the
judgment is paid off. Another situation
would be if the judgment debtor owns a business in which case you can file a
notice of judgment lien with the California Secretary of State. The major
advantage of the passive method is that in most cases it takes less time and
money to utilize the passive method. However the major disadvantage to the
passive method is that you may have to wait a long time before the judgment is
paid off.
This blog post is merely an overview of the basic strategy
for California judgment collections.
While some individuals do well collecting their own unpaid judgment many
do not have the time, money or inclination to attempt collection on their
own. Those individuals may want to
consider assigning the judgment to a judgment recovery professional.
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, has collected
unpaid California judgments since 1992 and has also worked in California and
Federal litigation since 1995 as a freelance paralegal.
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
View sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx
DISCLAIMER:
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment