Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

How to release a mechanics lien in California



How to release a mechanics lien in California is the topic of this blog post.  Any California mechanics lien can be released if the claimant does not attempt to enforce the lien within 90 days after the claim of lien is recorded.  The statutes in California that govern petitioning for release of a mechanics lien are found in Civil Code sections 8110 through 8494.

A petition for an order releasing a mechanics lien can be filed once more than 90 days have passed since the mechanics lien was recorded with the County Recorder.  This is due to the fact that Civil Code section 8460(a) states that, “(a) The claimant shall commence an action to enforce a lien within 90 days after recordation of the claim of lien. If the claimant does not commence an action to enforce the lien within that time, the claim of lien expires and is unenforceable.”

Civil Code section 8480 authorizes the filing of a petition for an order to release a mechanics lien.  That code section states in pertinent part that,

““(a) The owner of property or the owner of any interest in property subject to a claim of lien may petition the court for an order to release the property from the claim of lien if the claimant has not commenced an action to enforce the lien within the time provided in § 8460.”

Civil Code section 8482 requires that the owner of the property must give the lien claimant notice demanding that they execute and record a release of the mechanics lien at least 10 days before any petition is filed.

Civil Code section 8102 specifies what information must be included in the notice demanding the release of the mechanics lien. However it should be noted that section 8102 states that so long as the notice given is sufficient to notice is sufficient to substantially inform the person given notice of the information required by this section and other information required in the notice the notice is not invalid.

Civil Code section 8106 and 8110 specify how notice to the lien claimant must be given.

Civil Code section 8106 states that, “Except as otherwise provided by statute, notice under this part shall be given by any of the following means:

(a) Personal delivery.

(b) Mail in the manner provided in Section 8110.

(c) Leaving the notice and mailing a copy in the manner provided in Section 415.20 of the Code of Civil Procedure for service of summons and complaint in a civil action.

Civil Code section 8110 states that, “Except as otherwise provided by this part, notice by mail under this part shall be given by registered or certified mail, express mail, or overnight delivery by an express service carrier.”

Civil Code section 8484 specifies what must be included in the petition for an order releasing a mechanics lien. It should be noted that in addition to including other required information such as the date that the claim of lien was recorded and the book and page number where the claim was recorded, the petition must be verified. 

Civil Code section 8484 states that,

“A petition for a release order shall be verified and shall allege all of the following:

(a) The date of recordation of the claim of lien. A certified copy of the claim of lien shall be attached to the petition.

(b) The county in which the claim of lien is recorded.

(c) The book and page or series number of the place in the official records where the claim of lien is recorded.

(d) The legal description of the property subject to the claim of lien.

(e) Whether an extension of credit has been granted under Section 8460, if so to what date, and that the time for commencement of an action to enforce the lien has expired.

(f) That the owner has given the claimant notice under Section 8482 demanding that the claimant execute and record a release of the lien and that the claimant is unable or unwilling to do so or cannot with reasonable diligence be found.

(g) Whether an action to enforce the lien is pending.

(h) Whether the owner of the property or interest in the property has filed for relief in bankruptcy or there is another restraint that prevents the claimant from commencing an action to enforce the lien.”

Civil Code section 8486 requires that the hearing date on the petition must be set no more than 30 days from the filing of the petition by the clerk unless the Court orders otherwise and that notice of the hearing must be served on the lien claimant at least 15 days before the hearing.

Civil Code section 8488 states that the petitioner has the burden of showing at the hearing
that they have complied with the notice and service requirements. The lien claimant has the burden of proof as to the validity of the lien. Note that the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. 

The current Civil Code sections were revised in 2010 and became effective in 2011. The prior law only allowed for an award of $1,000.00 in attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.   The new law makes it much more advantageous for a party to petition for an order releasing an expired mechanics lien as if they prevail they may be awarded the attorney’s fees that they incurred in filing the petition. 

Attorneys or parties who would like to view a portion of a sample 9 page petition for release of mechanics lien containing brief instructions with citations to the Civil Code regarding the strict requirements for service of the notice, a verification, notice of hearing, and proposed order sold by the author can use the link shown below.


Attorneys or parties who would like to view or download a sample demand letter for release of mechanics lien in California created by the author can use the link shown below.

 
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. If you are in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.

To view over 255 sample legal documents for sale by the author of this blog post visit the following link: http://www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit: http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/

View sample legal document packages for sale here: http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.









How to suppress evidence in California from an illegal search and seizure



How to suppress evidence in California obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure is the topic of this blog post.   The proper procedure for suppressing evidence obtained from a search and seizure conducted without a valid warrant is specified in California Penal Code section 1538.5. This motion to suppress evidence may be used to challenge searches that were conducted either with or without a search warrant although this blog post will discuss only searches conducted without a valid search warrant.  

The provisions of California Penal Code section 1538.5(a)(1)(A) state in pertinent part that, “On motion, the court shall suppress evidence the People obtained as a result of a search or seizure on the grounds that the search or seizure without a warrant was unreasonable.

A motion to suppress evidence can result in the prosecution either dismissing the charges or offering a plea bargain with a much lighter sentence than what a defendant was previously facing.  This is due to the fact that if the evidence is suppressed the prosecutor's case against the moving defendant may be so lacking in evidence that they will have no choice but to dismiss or offer a favorable plea bargain.

The motion to suppress evidence must be in writing and must also be accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities that lists the specific items of property or evidence sought to be suppressed and the factual basis and legal authorities in support of the motion. See Penal Code § 1538.5(a)(2).

It is settled law in California that the burden of proving that a warrantless search was justified lies with the prosecution.  The defendant does however have the initial burden of showing that a search or seizure was without a warrant and that it was unreasonable under the circumstances.  A defendant can meet this burden by showing that the police performed a warrantless seizure.

In misdemeanor cases, the motion to suppress must be made and heard before trial. See Penal Code § 1538.5(g). However, the defense is entitled to a continuance of up to 30 days in misdemeanor cases to prepare for the hearing on the motion.  See Penal Code § 1538.5(l).

If the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion until the case is already in trial, the motion may be made and heard during trial. See Penal Code § 1538.5(h).

In felony matters, the motion may be made either at the preliminary hearing or later, upon filing of the information.  See Penal Code §§ 1538.5(f)(1) and 1538.5(f)(2) for more details.

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a sample motion to suppress evidence from a warrantless search in California sold by the author can use the link shown below.


The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. If you are in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.

To view over 255 sample legal documents for sale by the author of this blog post visit the following link: http://www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 245 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit: http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/

View sample legal document packages for sale here: http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx


DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.








Saturday, April 5, 2014

Experienced virtual paralegal for hire

Virtual paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 available for short-term projects involving off-site work. Extensive experience in reviewing pleadings and drafting appropriate responses based on legal research. Capable of working with little or no supervision. Excellent references available. Payments are accepted through PayPal. For a limited time if you qualify and pay for the services using PayPal you will have NO interest and NO payments for 6 months!

Numerous areas of expertise include:

Arbitration and mediation briefs

Bankruptcy court adversary complaints and answers to complaints

Complaints and answers to complaints

Discovery requests and responses for form and special Interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production of documents

Demurrers, motions for judgment on the pleadings, motions to strike


Eviction defense and eviction after foreclosure defense

Law and motion such as motion to quash service, motion for change of venue

Legal research

Probate including Heggstad Petitions

Creator of over 255 sample legal documents for use in California and Federal litigation.  Created over 200 blog posts for a blog that now has over 390,000 visits.  For more information view
the video shown above or send an e-mail to services@legaldocspro.com 

To subscribe to a FREE weekly legal newsletter visit Subscribe to FREE weekly newsletter